Why does
5:05 excite me? It excites me because it points to progress. It excites me
because it is very achievable and it excites me because I have something new to
chase. For a little background keep reading, to get to what I’m excited about
skip to the heart…
My last
couple of posts have been about my training and how I’m using me Heart Rate to
guide my training and racing to maximise my effort at a maintainable level. A couple of years ago I tried a similar strategy and I think I gained some good
growth in my running with it, but I never persisted with it. I did improve my
pace from initially over 6:00 min/k pace to 4:55 pace. Then I stopped. I’m not
sure why, ego?
Now I have
started again and it excites me. My early training – since Feb this year was
purely by HR, and I had no indication of the pace I was running at. I targeted 145
Bpm as I had trained to this before and my reading suggested that this number
is the ideal number for nearly all runners, regardless of ability.
There are
many formulas you can use, I struck on this one due to a blog that I read. As
with anything new, you always question it and a little research lead me to breakingmuscle.com and robertsontrainingsystems.com/. Both blogs heavily support
the 180 rule developed by Dr.Philip Maffetone which is essentially 180Bpm – your age for
your long run HR pace, or maximal aerobic capacity development. I've also posted on these pages and eagerly await some feedback on my training mix.
Since
picking up the Suunto Ambit in early March I was only recording my HR. Now I
can record my HR and then analyse the pace at the end of a run, and in more
detail on the computer at home. My last three weekend long runs have been at
the 145 Bpm average, but the varied terrain and incline made it difficult to
gauge average pace. Close analyse of the data showed I was running at 5:45-
5:55 on the flats.
Last
Tuesday I did what I call a HR pyramid on a flat 700m section of the trail. This
was to gauge my pace on the flat at set HR zone. Rep 1 was above 140 Bpm, rep 2
was above 150, rep 3 above 160, rep 4 was above 170 and rep 5 was to be a flat
out HR max. I could only hit 177 as the
max and held it to make 2 x 350 intervals. What were the times I was doing?
- 140-145 Bpm = 4:36 km pace
- 155 – 160 = 4:32
- 165 – 170 = 3:56
- 170 – 175 = 3:37
- 175+ was 3:18 pace
This has
been fairly consistent with my other training runs and 160 – 170 Bpm seems to be
the ‘comfort zone’ where I can now push for a couple of km to finish the last
300-400m at the 180 redline and roughly 3:30 pace for a strong 5km finish. My
recent Parkrun was very similar –I started at 160 Bpm and a roughly 4:30 pace and the last 1.5km was
run at 170+ for a 3:35 final km.
Heart rate training |
Now why did today's run excite me? I was feeling a little full of cold before heading off to
run, so the planned tempo hill run became and EZ run. It took about 800m for
the HR to settle (a little longer than usual), it maxed at 179 then instantly
settled at 138 Bpm. Yes, it was an extra EZ run and I enjoyed the 2-3% downhill
for 3.5 of the 6.25 kms on the 30 minute out trip.To give an indication, when running this trail the gradient change is subtle, but when riding you go from coasting along to a constant pedal to keep moving. The exciting part is that my
average pace was 5:04 and even hit 4:16 on the slightly downhill sections. On the return trip I allowed my
HR to push to 143 average up the hill and the pace hit 5:13kms, with a peak of
4:16 on the true flat of the last 300m.
The question is, is my two high intensity, 165 + interval or tempo sessions where I aim to build endurance at the high end going to complement the strength I'm developing at the low end?
My 12km #citytrail run Sunday the 19th will be another experiment - can I mainitain that magic 160 Bpm for 8 km, and then finish strong at 170 Bpm for the last 4km? It will be a physiological and psychological challenge but one I am very much looking forward to!
I'll let you know!
great post lachie! i've also tinkered with heart rate training but for whatever reason don't focus on it as seriously as i do on plain ol' pace-driven training. i admire your ability to map and track your progress - here's hoping the citytrail run is another breakthrough for you!
ReplyDeleteThanks Patrick. Like you I have toyed with this on and off, but now I'm taking it seriously. As I said, not having gps meant that pace driven training was not really an option for me, and tracking the data after each session is lots of fun. You should give it a go on your next EZ run. Chuck on the strap, hit 145 BPM and see how your pace goes. I'd love to know, I reckon Stan should give it a crack too!
Delete